A Macaca American Speaks out on LIARS IN THE GOVERNMENT

Please allow me some small hubris so I can educate the relatively less informed fellow Americans who will be voting next Tuesday.

Sen John Warner recently came back downbeat and worried about Iraq ( a rightwing conservative Senator).

Please let me SHARE some FACTS, because we in Science and Academia are all about data and facts and observable data.Anyone who had an iota of commonsense (examples would be Bush-41, Clinton etc) would have realized that until Saddam took control Iraq had successive violent unstable governments because of the nature of the region. Bush would not know it because he was clueless. But it is FACT, that the standing joke was that at Iraq's State Functions you stay the heck away from the President because you never know when he will be assassinated.

My father related this to me back in 1975 when Ali Bakr was still the President of Iraq, when my old man went on an official visit with my Aunt the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka, to Iraq which used to give a lot of aid to poor third world nations.

For you ignoramuses , Ali-Bakr was the President at that time; Saddam was his VEEP; all of them military type folks. Saddam ousted his mentor Ali-Bakr "peacefully and he retired because of ill health" and Saddam took over a time when oil money was pouring in at a rate.

He, like most other MidEast degenerates developed their nation's infrastructure rapidly. There were building booms and amazing development and all these nations hired skilled and semi skilled labor by the MILLIONS from S.Asia(specially India, Sri Lanka and Pakistan and Bangladesh). Sri Lankan workers flooded Saudi, Iraq, Kuwait etc and housemaids were also in great demand.And Ah of course the Big ugly Bear (being the Soviets) armed Iraq and the Great Eagle(being us) armed the Iranian pricktator the Shah.

They both salivated at the prospect of selling anything and everything possible to them for moola lotsa lotsa moolah. Those oil rich Arabs loved big toys, we loved their money.

The Persian Shah also loved our toys and even our 5-MegaWatt Nuclear Reactor!!!Thus, similar to other feudalocracies or one-man regimes in the region, Saddam was the only one able to lead such a fissiparous disunited bickering Arab nation for the longest period in Iraq's modern history. (Baath party rule).

We did not give a damn about who he killed and those trials we seem to want to broadcast to obfuscate issues All happened at a time when WE SIDED with him because those mad Shia mullahs in Iran were a bigger threat to us(why? because of what we did in Iran!!) .

Now the ancient hatreds and differences in Iraq have caused chaos for us and we are responsible for rushing in. Don't blame the Iraqi leaders, blame our lying utterly incompetent leaders and our societal collective HUBRIS.

The senate committee report has already debunked the lies and false connections ad infinitum and yet the Cheneys of the world LIE TO US. It makes me very sad that in this hallowed premise we fixate on a former President's philandering with an adult intern under mutual consent to deflect heat off of the PRESENT chaos we have self inflicted upon ourselves due to our IGNORANCE, HUBRIS and downright racial prejudices.


Until this regime, we always had a great protocol in the US: we NEVER refer to previous Presidencies or pass the buck on to them to deflect heat off our follies. Reagan didn't do it. 41 didn't do it. Clinton didn't do it, even Mister Peanut Grin didn't do it.Apparently the 3000 Iraqis dying a month are just colored folks not worthy of even a comma?

And young American lives lost? 2812 today.

Cost 600 BILLION? our religious extremist leaders who are in denial are the ones to blame Senator Jack Warner not those Imperially selected folks we have over there.

Our hubris is what caused this and is continuing to kill an average of 3000 Iraqis a month.

IT IS A COMMA SAYS THE Greatest leader of the freeworld!

A COMMA?We are in an infinite loop;. The getting out comes when the system is overloaded and we run out of RAM. To illustrate it, examine the loop at the end.

You all know that in some programming languages that a String variable is automatically initialized to nullString right? (Sen Warner also wants to withdraw if things are not better by Dec).

What do we do now? Smear all the Generals who spoke out or the ones like me who predicted this? or do we call John Warner names?

Denial for me is the state of mind when I think I am tall, handsome, and a stud. But that don't cause no world chaos do it? If there is democracy and elections in Pakistan or Saudi who will sweep the polls? the extremists because we have added in leaps and bounds to their cause by the mess we created in Iraq.

Evaluate the following loop and when it exits we win.

God bless all of you.

Dim invasion as String
Do While invasion x<>"Chaos"
If invasion="Chaos" then
Exit While
Else
invasion= "stay the course"
End if
Loop

MOMENTS IN TIME : OUR BELOVED LEADER IN 2000

BUSH: It really depends upon how our nation conducts itself in foreign policy. If we're an arrogant nation, they'll resent us. If we're a humble nation, but strong, they'll welcome us. And it's -- our nation stands alone right now in the world in terms of power, and that's why we have to be humble. And yet project strength in a way that promotes freedom. So I don't think they ought to look at us in any way other than what we are. We're a freedom-loving nation and if we're an arrogant nation they'll view us that way, but if we're a humble nation they'll respect us.

BUSH: I believe the role of the military is to fight and win war and, therefore, prevent war from happening in the first place

Some of our troops are not well-equipped. I believe we're overextended in too many places.

I don't think so. I think what we need to do is convince people who live in the lands they live in to build the nations. Maybe I'm missing something here. I mean, we're going to have kind of a nation building core from America? Absolutely not. Our military is meant to fight and win war. That's what it's meant to do. And when it gets overextended, morale drops. I strongly believe we need to have a military presence in the peninsula, not only to keep the peace in the peninsula, but to keep regional stability. And I strongly believe we need to keep a presence in NATO, but I'm going to be judicious as to how to use the military. It needs to be in our vital interest, the mission needs to be clear, and the extra strategy obvious.

The mission was changed. And as a result, our nation paid a price. And so I don't think our troops ought to be used for what's called nation-building. I think our troops ought to be used to fight and win war. I think our troops ought to be used to help overthrow the dictator when it's in our best interests. But in this case it was a nation-building exercise, and same with Haiti. I wouldn't have supported either.

They said we could, even though we're the strongest military, that if we don't do something quickly, we don't have a clearer vision of the military, if we don't stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we're going to have a serious problem coming down the road. And I'm going to prevent that. I'm going to rebuild our military power. It's one of the major priorities of my administration.